In an Eastern Conference Finals which has rapidly turned into a mismatch, the Boston Celtics drilled the visiting Orlando Magic in Game 3 of their best-of-seven tilt:
NBA.com has the box score of this beatdown.
The Celtics need just one more win to qualify for the 2010 NBA Finals.
Since 20 January 2009, our beloved President has been trying to shove down our throats a very strange and detrimental idea of economics.
It can be said that it started as early as September 2008 with President Bush still in office. I’ve been against the idea of bailing out banks and Wall Street with our hard-earned money from the get-go. TARP was a very bad idea. We are not obligated in any way to bail out those entities who made inappropriate decisions in trying to make a buck. Under threat from the federal government, they also inappropriately put people into properties they had absolutely no business in taking on or couldn’t afford. Now, those financial institutions are going belly up because of their own stupidity, not mine.
The current housing bubble burst can be traced as far back as 1999 when President Bill Clinton signed a fair housing act into law. That law should never have seen the light of day. I’m so sick of these mortgage advertisements on the radio. One particular local advertisement features a man with a loud southern accent (some may say he’s a squeaky voice).
Now in 2010, Obama and his cohorts are wanting to pass another stimulus! What in the world was that $800+ billion atrocity he was bawling about in 2009 for? Where are those jobs this administration “saved” or “created?” There are none!
One example of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 is the widening project of U.S. Highway 69 just north and south of Interstate 435 in Overland Park. Yes, that section of highway was in disarray for years, but it has not affected the economy of the Kansas City metropolitan area one bit!
Another example affects me personally. Until recently, one of my relatives worked for a Kansas government department. Stimulus funds were used to help people with assistance in certain situations. It was said that one attorney hired/contracted by the State of Kansas fouled up on a contract considering how to appropriately fund assistance programs for those aforementioned people. This attorney foul-up made the state of Kansas liable for those hundred of thousands of dollars from ARRA.
To help pay that back, this department for whatever reason decided to freeze wages and salaries for its employees for three years. In addition to that, this department was asking for voluntary pay cuts.
Last month, she attended a seminar in the Kansas City area on Martin Luther King, Jr. The presenter asked the audience if they were doing work for the devil or felt they were doing stuff for the devil. She was told by her friend that it was rumored that the Pope refuses to go through Topeka’s airspace because its ZIP codes start with 666 (e.g. 66611 for a section of northeastern Topeka).
That was it for my relative. She quickly cleaned out her desk and quit. She does not regret that decision. As I speak, she may already have a better job locally in Kansas City, Kansas instead of far in Topeka.
So, this so-called stimulus has cost jobs. Not created or saved. Those “created” or “saved” numbers do not add up to a hill of beans. Because of all this waste, this administration is reducing the U.S. Dollar to no more than Monopoly play money!
For me, November 2010 is fast approaching and I cannot wait for 2012, because we need to clean house promptly! Those who are running better wise up because we Americans have had it with the reckless government spending, the shredding of our livelihoods, and the shredding of our Constitution!
Note: We will make a very detailed post with background, links and citations, so please bookmark this article and check back soon.
In the meantime, here are our video responses to Lisa Vorderbrueggen’s Sunday, December 20, 2009 article. Her front-page piece named Conservative New Media and CNM founder John D. Villarreal:
Part 1
*
Part 2
*
Part 3
*
Part 4
*
Part 5
*
Part 6
*
Part 7
*
Part 8
*
Part 9
*
Part 10
*
Part 11 – Final
*
*
*
On Sunday, Dec 20, 2009, the Contra Costa Times (CCT) print edition ran a lengthy front-page-of-the-second-section story which we feel unfairly smeared Conservative New Media (CNM) and its founder, John D. Villarreal. That story was written by CCT political editor Lisa Vorderbrueggen.
CNM had anticipated how Ms Vorderbrueggen would portray us in her piece. We actually had scooped the CCT editor on what we figured was to be her originally-planned story with a series of videos we posted on Tuesday, December 15, 2009.
The video series discussed Robert Beadles‘ affinity for controversial talk radio host Alex Jones. Mr. Beadles, a Republican, is running as a candidate for the United States House of Representatives. He is one of several potential challengers to Democrat Congressman Jerry McNerney in the pending 2010 election for the 11th district of California.
That 5-part video series can be viewed here. If you are short on time, we recommend parts 4 & 5 for a synopsis of the series:
Part 1
http://bit.ly/589sBj
Part 2
http://bit.ly/7H41kt
Part 3
http://bit.ly/6yGDpa
Part 4
http://bit.ly/8OJMD0
Part 5
http://bit.ly/4w7OHh
As we detail in this series of videos, we believe that our advanced derailing of the preferred narrative for her Dec 20 story irked Ms. Vorderbrueggen. Her apparent displeasure, we feel, was borne out in what she ended up writing about CNM in her piece.
Our new, 11-part video series critically examines Ms. Vorderbrueggen present article. It also discusses Ms. Vorderbrueggen’s background as a reporter, as well as some controversies and criticisms which have dogged her over the course of her political reporting career.
The following are links which we either allude to in the new video series or else ones which will provide further information on Ms. Vorderbrueggen and additional background on the present situation between her and CNM.
* The title for the print version of Lisa Vorderbrueggen’s Dec. 20, 2009 page A-19 (front page of the ‘East Bay & Bay Area’ section of the Contra Costa Times) article was “Anonymous Blog Sniper Comes Clean.” This is the article in which Ms. Vorderbrueggen mentions CNM and John D. Villarreal.
The online version of Ms. Vorderbrueggen’s piece is now available. The title has been changed to “Blog sniper turns out to be CD11 campaign consultant.” It can be viewed here: http://bit.ly/4zkowl
* Purportedly objective CCT political editor and reporter Lisa Vorderbrueggen is a “fan” of candidate Robert Beadles on Beadles’ Facebook page:
http://bit.ly/69l9y9
* Lisa Vorderbrueggen called out for allegedly being biased towards Democrats, and specifically towards certain Democrats over others in the recent California CD-10 race to replace Congresswoman Ellen Taucher:
* Lisa Vorderbrueggen’s colleague was taken to task by, of all sources, MSNBC for giving money to the Democratic National Committee. MSNBC didn’t see anything wrong with the donation and, according to the quote, apparently there is no policy against such partisan donation-giving at Vorderbrueggen’s employer, the Contra Costa Times:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19113455/ns/politics/#Taylor
* It appears that even the CC Times’ readers perceive the publication as biased. On the paper’s own site, this comment thread of Times perusers upbraids the periodical for its stilted coverage:
In fact, at least one reader felt so strongly about what he or she believes are the Times’ partisan leanings that there is now an entire blog devoted to monitoring and answering the supposed liberal bias found in the Contra Costa Times. Of course, this is a group of anonymous blogger(s) that Lisa Vorderbrueggen can’t assail by name and who are trying to act as watchdog(s)/whistle-blower(s). This may account for some of her apparent dislike of anonymous bloggers:
* “Lisa Vorderbrueggen to address Coco Taxpayers luncheon, Nov 30″ (2007)
http://bit.ly/4voE9A
Was Ms. Vorderbrueggen paid to address the Contra Costa County Taxpayers Association? If so, by whom? Was the event partisan? If Ms. Vorderbrueggen was paid for her appearance, how might this have affected her remarks?
* Why did none of the following, or similar, information appear in Vorderbrueggen’s article about Conservative New Media? These pieces show that the practice criticized by Lisa Vorderbrueggen — being surreptitiously paid or volunteering to provide a particular point of view on the internet, anonymously or otherwise — is widespread on the political left and, indeed, on the largest blog (Daily Kos, a far-left site) in the political space. In fact, Lisa never mentions anyone on the left engaging this practice, which gives the wholly false impression that this phenomenon is confined to the right. Ha ha, the left invented it! Truth be told, the left practically owns the internet and new media, which is why we founded CNM.
“Blogging for Dollars” — Daily Kos founder Markos Moulitsas Zuniga paid by Howard Dean campaign in order to induce Zuniga to write and say favorable things about Howard Dean
“Jane Hamsher: Friend or Foe” — Bloggers “slinkerwink” and “nyceve” paid by liberal Firedoglake site to post on Daily Kos
“Confessions of an Obama Paid Blogger” — …
(article about ‘turfers; and get an article about volunteer turfers)
Use Patterico’s form letter on OFA for volunteer turfers stuff
Use Ellie Light stuff for turfers, at highest levels of Dem govt
-
Further, as…(and GOP C wasnt paid to do this; what he said was true)
*
LV interviewed after St. Marys Debate (8.11.09)
http://bit.ly/7IEty0
(misidentifies guy; calls Lt Gov [who won] “Mr. Geramandi,” not Lt Gov.; DeSaulnier glowing intro. 2 instances of apparent bias)
*
Newspaper Death Watch
http://bit.ly/4H5E
CC Times circulation down 3.3%
http://bit.ly/67joRX
Job cuts & furloughs for CC Times
http://bit.ly/kBRxW
CC Time’s owner in financial trouble
http://bit.ly/ZRLRP
[To be continued soon...]
*
Add all new stuff about “Ellie Light,” etc.
Fox News