David Harmer’s Campaign is Drinking the Kool-Aid
The David Harmer campaign must release talking points on how to deal with people like me because I’ve heard on multiple occasions now that I’m “drinking the McNerney kool-aid.” The only problem is that when I ask them what “kool-aid” they are talking about nobody can answer me.
Who is drinking who’s kool-aid is the real question. I’ve run my own campaign on this blog against David Harmer because I think he is COMPLETELY wrong for our district. The people of CD-2 in Utah thought the same thing and the people of CD-10 here next door agree as well.
I have found my own information without Jerry’s help. I have come up with my own conclusions without Jerry’s help. The bottom line is this: We don’t need David Harmer. We have several good candidates from this district. There was no need for the puppet-masters to bring in the failed bay-area lawyer. He brings nothing to the table except broken relationships and resentment. It is quite the disservice to the constituents of our district as well. It shows a lack of respect and understanding of us regular people out here. It is yet another example of the elitist world some of these people in politics live in.
So what do we know about David Harmer?
- Harmer doesn’t live here.
- Harmer just finished running in the 10th district and lost (this past November)
- Harmer ran a failed race in 96 in Utah CD-2
- Harmer is a bay area lawyer wanting to represent a district largely covered in agricultural land
- Harmer didn’t publicly take a position on same-sex marriage during his failed CD-10 run (See this link… page 3 under “Gay Rights”)
- Harmer constantly touts his Reagan conservatism yet all we see is political speak
- Harmer cannot even vote for himself
- The overwhelming majority of Harmer’s contributions come from outside of CD-11 (all but 16%)
- Harmer supports earmarks (See this link…page 3 under Transportation)
- Harmer stole the CRA endorsement. (See this link)
Are those lies? Is this the Jerry McNerney kool-aid?
My candidate is Brad Goehring. What do I know about him?
Brad Goehring is a guy who has lived in the valley for most of his life. He can vote for himself because he LIVES HERE! He is a farmer which is ideal in my opinion that he is wanting to represent a farming district. He has run a business and knows how to budget properly. He is very pro 2nd amendment and has a carry permit to prove it. He is pro-life. Oh and he considers himself a conservative before a Republican. Maybe that’s what has everyone in the PARTY up in arms????
Are these all lies? I suppose I’m not the one drinking the kool-aid now am I? Maybe it’s higher ups in the party that figured us dumb little voters would just LOVE to have a bay area lawyer come over the mountain to rescue us and represent us even though he has ABSOLUTELY NO vested interest in our district. I’m sorry but the Harmer folks are the ones GULPING the kool-aid. And it’s getting really sickening and scary to be quite frank.
Originally posted at http://www.rtamerican.us and written by John Heida. John Heida is not paid by any campaign and is not paid by Conservative New Media. He is only a guest author and has his own opinions which you can find on his website at http://www.rtamerican.us. The views expressed in this article are John Heida’s personal opinions only and are meant for informational and entertainment purposes only. John Heida does not allege any facts, cast aspersions on anyone, or make any claims about what he says here, or in any of his other columns on Conservative New Media or on his site. Again, these are only John Heida’s own personal opinions and his First Amendment protected exercise thereof. These opinions are not necessarily the views of Conservative New Media and Conservative New Media does not endorse or represent or warrant any of the content of his articles in any way and is not responsible for them.
